Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Roemer v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State University et al
as 2:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Gary Roemer
Defendant:
Board of Regents of New Mexico State University, Dan Arvizu, Laura Castille and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lovato et al v. Lytle et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lovoto, Joshua Beasley, Callupp Henderson and others
Defendant:
Joe Lytle, Emmitt Bland, Jesse Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fish v. Occupational Health & Safety Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Edward Russell Fish
Defendant:
Occupational Health & Safety Administration, New Mexico State University, Ammu Devasthali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguilera v. City of Las Cruces et al
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Eddie Dan Aguilera
Defendant:
City of Las Cruces, Miguel Domingues and Ken Miyagishima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00593
Defendant:
Forrest Fenn, Dan Barbarisi, Jonathan Stuef and others
Plaintiff:
Bruno Raphoz and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Raphoz v. Fenn et al
as 1:2021cv00553
Defendant:
Forrest Fenn, Dan Barbarisi, Jonathan Stuef and others
Plaintiff:
Bruno Raphoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Bourne et al
as 1:2020cv01028
Petitioner:
Dan Flores
Respondent:
Robin Bourne, State of New Mexico and John Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2020cv01027
Respondent:
Robin Bourne, John Sanchez and State of New Mexico
Defendant:
Dan Flores
Plaintiff:
Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Taylor v. Robles
as 1:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Dan Robles
Plaintiff:
Leland T Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguilera v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 2:2019cv00280
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque, David Gonzales and J Oguinn
Plaintiff:
Eddie Dan Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
