Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01532
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NELSON v. PLOTZ et al
as 1:2021cv01409
Defendant: STATE OF COLORADO, SETH RYAN, DAVID WAITE and others
Plaintiff: BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nelson v. Hotsenpiller et al
as 1:2020cv03387
Defendant: Joshua Ashe, Christopher Danos, Dan Hotsenpiller and others
Plaintiff: Brett Andrew Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House of Nelson v. Hotsenpiller et al
as 1:2020cv02226
Defendant: Joshua Dougherty, Lori Beth Talbot, Jessica Waggoner and others
Plaintiff: Brett Andrew Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tattered Cover, Inc. et al v. Brohl et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01431
Plaintiff: Tattered Cover, Inc. , Back Country Books, Inc. , Thomas G. Mulligan and others
Defendant: Barbara Brohl , John Hickenlooper , John Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trans-High Corporation et al v. State of Colorado, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01389
Plaintiff: Trans-High Corporation , Daily Doobie, LLC, The and Hemp Connoisseur, LLC, The
Defendant: State of Colorado, The and John Hickenlooper
Consol_plaintiff: Tattered Cover, Inc. , Back Country Books, Inc. , Thomas G. Mulligan and others
Consol_defendant: Barbara Brohl , John Suthers , Pete Weir and others
Counter_defendant: Frank Ruybalid and Dan May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carbajal v. Hotsenpiller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02007
Plaintiff: Dean Carbajal
Defendant: Dan Hotsenpiller, Dan (I) Hotsenpiller, Seith Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?