Cases
Kavin Rhodes v. Earnest Rowe, et al
as 17-55920
Petitioner - Appellant: KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Respondent - Appellee: EARNEST ROWE, CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and DAN LUNGREN
Michael McDonald v. Ira Riener, et al
as 14-55288
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee: IRA - RIENER, former District Attorney of California, from 1984-1992, DAN LUNGREN and THERESA MITCHELL
Michael McDonald v. Ira Riener et al
as 2:2013cv09117
Defendant: Does, Dan Lungren, Theresa Mitchell and others
Plaintiff: Michael McDonald
Michael Larry v. M. L. Smith, et al
as 12-55760
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL A. LARRY
Respondent - Appellee: M. L. SMITH, JAMES GOMEZ, DAN LUNGREN and others
Michael A Larry v. M L Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1997cv02649
Respondent: James Gomez, Dan Lungren and M L Smith
Petitioner: Michael A Larry, .
Defendant: Larry E Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Carpenter v. State of California, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-16635
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL J. CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADULT & YOUTH CORRECTIONAL AGENCY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Rice v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01829
Plaintiff: Gregory M Rice
Defendant: USA , State of California, LA County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Carpenter v. State of California, et al
as 10-15566
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL J. CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADULT & YOUTH CORRECTIONAL AGENCY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Alvarez v. Calderon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1997cv01895
Petitioner: Manuel Machado Alvarez
Respondent: Arthur Calderon , Dan Lungren and Robert L. Ayers
Defendant: Warden E Ylst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?