Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brian Davis, et al v. Lucinda Baier, et al
as 24-5147
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DAVIS, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., ROBERT BAZINET, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. and BRIAN BICKETT, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
Defendant:
LUCINDA M. BAIER, T. ANDREW SMITH, STEVEN E. SWAIN and others
Bickett et al v. Baier et al
as 3:2021cv00904
Plaintiff:
Brian Bickett and Robert Bazinet
Defendant:
Lucinda M. Baier, T. Andrew Smith, Steven E. Swain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Templin v. Baier et al
as 3:2021cv00407
Defendant:
Denise W. Warren, T. Andrew Smith, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Templin
Anders v. Baier et al
as 3:2021cv00373
Defendant:
Denise W. Warren, T. Andrew Smith, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stefanie Anders
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Patricia Templin
Davis v. Baier et al
as 3:2020cv00929
Defendant:
Denise W. Warren, T. Andrew Smith, Mark J. Parrell and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Davis, Cynthia McMahon, Robert Bazinet and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Victoria L. Freed
Decker v. Ledford (TVV)
as 3:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Daniel Andrew Decker
Defendant:
Robert Ledford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Decker v. Ledford (TVV)
as 3:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
Daniel Andrew Decker
Defendant:
Robert Ledford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRECTV, LLC v. Decker
as 3:2013cv01131
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel A Decker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Decker v. Colsen
as 1:2012cv00380
Petitioner:
Daniel Andrew Decker
Respondent:
Roland Colsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. Colsen
as 3:2012cv01158
Petitioner:
Daniel Andrew Decker
Respondent:
Roland Colsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
