Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Baldwin v. Dickerson
as 9:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ira James Baldwin
Defendant:
Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huricks v. Sumner et al
as 9:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Timothy Donald Huricks
Respondent:
Misty Sumner, Angie Cargill, Elizabeth Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson et al v. Collier et al
as 9:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Mark Robertson, George Curry, Tony Egbuna Ford and others
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson et al v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Mark Robertson, George Curry, Tony Egbuna Ford and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackmon v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice: Allan B. Polonsky Unit et al
as 9:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Dana Blackmon
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice: Allan B. Polonksy Unite, UTMB Correctional Managed Care, Daniel Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beatty v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv03658
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lane Beatty
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Dickerson
as 9:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Keith Wagner
Defendant:
Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00908
Petitioner:
Lucus Morgan
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Dickerson and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thunderhorse v. Collier et al
as 9:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Kimberly Cotton, Bryan Collier, Daniel Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burcham v. Dickerson
as 3:2019cv02314
Respondent:
Daniel Dickerson
Petitioner:
Brandon Keith Burcham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
