Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
US v. Carpenter
as 24-1389
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Interested Party: BRIAN FITZGERALD, Estate of Byron Darling and ESTATE OF BYRON DARLING
Carpenter v. Sitek
as 3:2023cv00719
Petitioner: Daniel E. Carpenter
Respondent: Jonathan Sitek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carpenter v. United States Probation and Pretrial Services
as 3:2022cv01268
Petitioner: Daniel E. Carpenter
Respondent: United States Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
US v. Carpenter
as 21-1935
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Interested Party: BRIAN FITZERALD, Estate of Byron Darling
Carpenter v. USA
as 3:2021cv01485
Petitioner: Daniel E. Carpenter
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nova Group, Inc v. Universitas Education, LLC
as 21-2691
Petitioner: Nova Group, Inc, as Trustee, Sponsor and Named Fiduciary of the Charter Oak Trust Welfare Benefit Plan
Respondent / Appellee: Universitas Education, LLC
Respondent: Grist Mill Trust Welfare Benefit Plan, Avon Capital LLC, Charter Oak Trust Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Universitas Education, LLC v. Nova Group, Inc
as 21-2690
Petitioner: Universitas Education, LLC
Respondent: Nova Group, Inc, as Trustee, Sponsor and Named Fiduciary of The Charter Oak Trust Welfare Benefit Plan, Grist Mill Trust Welfare Benefit Plan, Avon Capital LLC and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Daniel E. Carpenter
US v. Carpenter
as 20-2133
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Carpenter v. US
as 20-1651
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Carpenter v. Sawyer
as 3:2020cv00664
Petitioner: Daniel E. Carpenter
Respondent: Kathleen Hawk Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?