Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Graf v. U.S. Army et al
as 1:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Graf
Defendant:
U.S. Army, U.S. Navy and National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Graf v. Iora et al
as 1:2023cv01375
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Graf
Defendant:
Marcos V. Iora, II Dean Harro and Special Agent Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cebe v. Zola et al
as 3:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
Mackenson Cebe
Defendant:
Joseph D. Zola, Judge Fred Parantoni, Joseph F. Saporitor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HICKEY v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv01401
Plaintiff:
MARIE HICKEY
Defendant:
ZURICH, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EDWARDS v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04715
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Meridian Bank et al
as 4:2015cv00947
Plaintiff:
Danielle Edwards
Defendant:
Meridian Bank and Christopher J. Annas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Meyers v. Alexander et al
as 1:2012cv01276
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Meyers
Defendant:
Gary D. Alexander, Constance L. Swan, Martha Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIVENS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2012cv00365
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GIVENS
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and DANIEL EDWARD FITZSIMMONS
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEAL, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74427
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EDWARD DEAL
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
