Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Jolly v. White et al
as 1:2020cv02505
Defendant:
Carmelita White and Daniel Everett
Plaintiff:
Linda Jolly
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431
Daniel Everett v. Justices of the California Sup, et al
as 20-16502
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT and YVETTE ROLAND, State Bar Court Judge
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL EVERETT
HANKEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv97021
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EVERETT HANKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everett v. Justices of the California Supreme Court et al
as 3:2020mc80085
Defendant:
State Bar Court Judge Yvette Roland, State Bar of California and Justices of the California Supreme Court
Plaintiff:
Daniel Everett
Everett v. Justices of the California Supreme Court et al
as 3:2020cv03504
Defendant:
State Bar Court Judge Yvette Roland, State Bar of California and Justices of the California Supreme Court
Plaintiff:
Daniel Everett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01860
Plaintiff:
Danielle Everett Smith
Defendant:
Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Snodgrass v. The Medical/Dental Facility at the Regional Medical Center
as 3:2020cv00225
Defendant:
The Medical/Dental Facility at the Regional Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Daniel Everett Snodgrass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Bar of California v. Daniel Everett
as 20-15379
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL EVERETT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Snodgrass v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00134
Defendant:
Dr. Nathaniel Williams and Regional Medical Clinic or RMC Warden
Plaintiff:
Daniel Everett Snodgrass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Bar of California v. Everett
as 3:2020mc80014
Defendant:
Daniel Everett
Plaintiff:
State Bar of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
