Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dick v. Wilson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00353
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Grant Dick
Defendant:
B. Wilson, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Daniel Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00633
Defendant:
Brian Wilson, T. Jones, Willie Byrts and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Fitzpatrick et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00393
Defendant:
T. Jones, Gallew David, D. Swift and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Gay et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Brian Wilson, Gwendolyn Babers, Eleval Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Gay et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alan Walker
Defendant:
Daniel Gay, Robert Harris, Nurse Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahone v. Dunn, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00988
Plaintiff:
Dean Eric Mahone
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Derrick Carter and Daniel Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jason Jermaine Hall
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Cam Ward, Mike Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. Mason et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
Tyricka Lavon Calloway
Defendant:
Rene Mason, Jeremiah Thomas, Col. Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gay v. Holt et al
as 2:2008cv01517
Petitioner:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Respondent:
Kathy Holt and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. DeLoach et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2008cv00561
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant:
James DeLoach and Cathy Holt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
