Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Daniel JonesIn re: Daniel Jones
as 22-5908
Petitioner: In re: DANIEL H. JONES
Respondent: JASON CLENDENION
Daniel Jones v. Kent Hendrickson, et al
as 22-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL H. JONES
Defendant / Appellee: KENT HENDRICKSON, Judge, GLENN EARL ACREE, Judge, CHRISTOPHER SHEA NICKELL, Judge and others
Jones v. Hendrickson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00165
Plaintiff: Daniel H. Jones
Defendant: Kent Hendrickson, Glenn E. Acree, Christopher Nickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Clendenion We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00099
Petitioner: Daniel H Jones
Respondent: Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Jones v. Claudia Bonnyman, et al
as 19-5209
Defendant / Appellee: JIM PURVIANCE, Executive Director, RICHARD MONTGOMERY, Chair, RUSSELL T. PERKINS, Part-IV, Chancellor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL H. JONES
Jones v. Bonnyman et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Plaintiff: Daniel H. Jones
Defendant: Claudia C. Bonnyman, Richard Montgomery, Ellen L. Hobbs Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Goodwin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00457
Plaintiff: Daniel H Jones
Defendant: James F. Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00096
Plaintiff: Daniel H. Jones
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kent Hendrickson, Acree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Daniel Jones
as 16-5128
Movant: In re: DANIEL H. JONES
Respondent: DEBRA K. JOHNSON, Warden
Jones v. Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00297
Petitioner: Daniel H Jones
Respondent: Debra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?