Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JUNG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08274
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
In re: Fyre Festival Litigatio
as 21-988
Respondent:
Does 1-50, inclusive, William McFarland and Fyre Media, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Petitioner:
Daniel Jung, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Robert Skazel v. Thomas Valfrid Anderson et al
as 2:2018cv03669
Defendant:
Thomas Valfrid Anderson, Daniel Jung, Daniel Jung individually doing business as Anderson and Jung and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Skazel
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Daniel Jung v. Billy McFarland et al
as 1:2018cv00449
Defendant:
JEFFREY ATKINS, Fyre Media, Inc, Does 1-50, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
exocad GmbH v. B&D Dental et al
as 2:2017cv01252
Plaintiff:
exocad GmbH
Defendant:
B&D Dental and Daniel Jung
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
FenF, LLC v. Jung et al
as 2:2017cv11810
Plaintiff:
FenF, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Jung and Andrew Jung
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Daniel Jung v. Billy McFarland et al
as CAC/2:17-cv-03245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jung
Defendant:
Billy McFarland , Jeffrey Atkins , Fyre Media, Inc. and others
In re Fyre Festival Litigation
as 1:2017cv03296
Defendant:
Grant Margolin, William McFarland, Jeffrey Atkins and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Herlihy and Anthony Lauriello
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Sean Daly, Edward Ivey, Ritu Jutla and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Investors Doe and Doe Property Owner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Daniel Jung v. Billy McFarland et al
as 2:2017cv03245
Defendant:
Jeffrey Atkins, Doe Investors, Doe Property Owner and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jung
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
