Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Nicholas v. U S Xpress Inc et al
as 2:2022cv05657
Plaintiff:
Jacolby Nicholas
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., Mountain Lake Retention Group, Inc., Daniel Mora and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Sanchez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv00372
Plaintiff:
Carmen Danielle Mora Sanchez
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Hiday & Ricke, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Daniel Mora Mendoza v. W.J. Sullivan
as 8:2019cv00622
Petitioner:
Daniel Mora Mendoza
Respondent:
W.J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORA v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv07471
Defendant:
TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MORA
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Evengelio et al v. M/V Amber Express
as 1:2015cv20144
Plaintiff:
Edgardo R. Evengelio , George Lutz Sopenasky , Daniel Mora Hernandez and others
Defendant:
M/V Amber Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
