Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mayte Guerrero Avina et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2023cv10573
Plaintiff:
Mayte Guerrero Avina and Daniel Ortiz-Magdaleno
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Daniel Ortiz v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv02737
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ortiz Alvarez v. Garland
as 22-1705
Petitioner:
OSCAR DANIEL ORTIZ ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ortiz v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08285
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fuentes v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv01686
Plaintiff:
Norma Alicia Fuentes
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Daniel Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
A.N.L. v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02702
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
A.N.L. and Danielle Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Ortiz Solano v. William Barr
as 19-71390
Petitioner:
DANIEL ORTIZ SOLANO, AKA Lucinno Ortiz-Solani, AKA Daniel Ortiz-Solano
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Daniel Ortiz Solano v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72329
Petitioner:
DANIEL ORTIZ SOLANO, AKA Lucinno Ortiz-Solani, AKA Daniel Ortiz-Solano
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Robert Daniel Ortiz v. Powerhouse Retail Services LLC et al
as 2:2017cv07061
Defendant:
DOES and Powerhouse Retail Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Roberto Daniel Ortiz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
