Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Gonzalez v. McDonough
as 23-1347
Claimant:
DANIEL ROSARIO GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Rosario v. Mountain Top Market et al
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
Mountain Top Market, MOUNTAIN TOP MARKET & GAS, PROGRESSIVE GARDEN STATE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
ROSARIO v. MOUNTAIN TOP MARKET et al
as 2:2021cv13749
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
MOUNTAIN TOP MARKET, MOUNTAIN TOP MARKET & GAS, PROGRESSIVE GARDEN STATE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonilla v. Danes Parking Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv10184
Plaintiff:
Rafael Pena Bonilla
Defendant:
Daniel Rosario and Danes Parking Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ROSARIO et al v. CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
as 1:2019cv01097
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROSARIO and NICOLE LUGO
Defendant:
CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosario-Gonzalez v. United States of America (Dept. of Veterans Affairs)
as 3:2017cv02143
Defendant:
United States of America (Dept. of Veterans Affairs)
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rosario-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rosario-Gonzalez v. Quinones-Nieves, et al
as 17-1408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CARMEN MARGARITA QUINONES-NIEVES, KARLA ARLEEN MORALES-MORALES, CAROL MARIE MORALES-MORALES and others
Rosario-Gonzalez v. US Dept of Veterans Affair
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ
Appellee:
US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Rosario-Gonzalez v. US Dept of Veterans Affair
as 17-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ
Appellee:
US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Rosario-Gonzalez v. Quinonez-Nieves et al
as 3:2016cv03067
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rosario-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Carmen Margarita Quinones-Nieves, Karla Arleen Morales-Morales, Carol Marie Morales-Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
