Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Foster v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00598
Plaintiff:
Sheila Foster
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; and Daniel Scott Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Scott v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv01647
Petitioner:
Daniel Scott
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bonin et al v. Sabine River Authority of Texas
as 1:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Perry Bonin , Ace Chandler , Michael . Manuel and others
Defendant:
Sabine River Authority of Texas and Sabine River Authority of Louisiana
Respondent:
Judy Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eugene Cadena v. Daniel Scott, et al
as 5:2015cv00552
Plaintiff:
Eugene Cadena
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Catherine Gagnon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Low Country Quisine by Jolie' Ramize LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01170
Plaintiff:
Danielle Scott
Defendant:
Low Country Quisine by Jolie' Ramize LLC and Enjolik Oree-Bailey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scott f/k/a Danielle Ballis v. National Credit Systems, Inc.
as 4:2012cv01044
Plaintiff:
Danielle Scott
Defendant:
National Credit Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Acuna et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Vincent Acuna, Jr., Jorge Aguilar O.J.R., Brian Albrecht and others
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Acuna et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
Vincent Acuna, Jr., Jorge Aguilar O.J.R., Brian Albrecht and others
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv03484
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
