Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Milford Washington v. Michael Reed
as 14-7760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILFORD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL REED, PATRICK GURNEY, LOUIS B. CEI and others
Andre Cuffee v. Daniel Mahon
as 14-6211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE N. CUFFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden and T. ROSE, Safety Specialist
Cuffee v. Mahon et al
as 2:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Andre N. Cuffee
Defendant:
Daniel T. Mahon and T. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuffee v. Mahon et al
as 2:2013cv00405
Plaintiff:
Andre N. Cuffee
Defendant:
Daniel T. Mahon and T. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Levin et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Darryl A. White
Defendant:
Leonard Levin, Debra J. Kirksey, E. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earl Morgan, III v. R. Lewi
as 13-6023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL J. MORGAN, III
Defendant - Appellee:
R. K. LEWIS, HCC Captain, J. W. KING, HCC Sergeant, DOBYNS, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
PATRICK J. GURNEY, HCC Assist. Warden and DANIEL T. MAHON
Colin Whitehouse v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLIN D. WHITEHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN M. JABE, Deputy Director of VADOC, DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden and others
Morgan, III v. Lewis et al
as 1:2011cv01150
Plaintiff:
Earl J. Morgan, III
Defendant:
R. K. Lewis, J. W. King, Dobyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trisler v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00343
Plaintiff:
Jason Trisler
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Omezie S. Ajumobi, Richard B. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trisler v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv00554
Defendant:
Dr. Omezie S. Ajumobi, Nurse Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Trisler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
