Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2019cv01084
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Governer Lawrance Hogan, CEO Jhon Collins, Dr. Linda Dahoyos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lanahan v. Ryan
as 1:2019cv00017
Respondent:
Patrick W. Ryan
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2018cv02284
Defendant:
Nurse Macanda, Governer Lawrance Hogan, Drumberger and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lanahan v. Governer Lawrance Hogan et al
as 1:2018cv02177
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Governer Lawrance Hogan, Dr Delahoyas and Dr. Vanderlind
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2018cv00833
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Sheri Passrell, Stelious Vantelas, Ame Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Clifton T. Pirkins Hospital Center et al
as 1:2017cv03187
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Clifton T. Pirkins Hospital Center, Lawrance Hogan, Valtre Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2017cv03186
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Lawrance Hogan, Passarell and John Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Lanahan v. Patuxent Institution
as 17-6591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL THOMAS LANAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATUXENT INSTITUTION, TANIKA AMASON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ANDERSON and others
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Lawrence Hogan, Tom Lewis, Nina Diana Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Larry Lawrance Hogan, Tom Lewis, Director Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
