Cases 1 - 10 of 9,521
Roy v. Nightingale et al
as 3:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Todd Nightingale, Ronald Kisling, Aida Alvarez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bichanich v. Young
as 2:2024cv04920
Petitioner:
Daniel Bichanich
Respondent:
Sara Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Machado v. Boyd et al
as 4:2024cv03525
Plaintiff:
Enmanuel Isaias Erazo Machado
Defendant:
Daniel Boyd, Prince Nagi, Rony Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Daniels v. Garcia, et al
as 1:2024cv03476
Plaintiff:
Zacharias Daniels
Defendant:
A. Garcia, Sgt. G. Vega, A. Pola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epps v. San Mateo County et al
as 3:2024cv03471
Plaintiff:
Daniel T Epps
Defendant:
San Mateo County, San Mateo County Jail/Maguire Correctional Facility, California Board of Registered Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope for The Homeless Lakeside, Inc. et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Hope for The Homeless Lakeside, Inc., Brian Albone, Michael Bishop and others
Defendant:
County of San Diego, City of Lakeside, City of San Diego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
