Cases 1 - 10 of 8,366
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROONEY v. SHERRY et al
as 2:2024cv02482
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE ROONEY
Defendant:
DANIEL SHERRY, GEORGE FORCE, EDWARD FULWILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
TIPTON v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
SKY TIPTON
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID CLOSE, MICHELLE IVICIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DANKO et al v. D & G STEEL, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DANKO and DANIELLE L. HARSHMAN
Defendant:
D & G STEEL, INC., JOHN D. NOVAK and LLILAULIH A. EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337 E.R.I.S.A.
HASCHALK v. RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS INC.
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE HASCHALK
Defendant:
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schutts et al v. The University of the Arts
as 2:2024cv02420
Plaintiff:
Brad M. Schutts, Laura Grutzeck, Carolina Blatt and others
Defendant:
The University of the Arts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TERRELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIELS, WALSTON and SURGI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEIM
as 2:2024cv02365
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. KEIM
Defendant:
JAMES E. VANZOEREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
KEIM v. VANZOEREN
as 5:2024cv02365
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. KEIM
Defendant:
JAMES E. VANZOEREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
