Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jefferson v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04352
Defendant:
SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., Hospira Worldwide, LLC, SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Recarr Jefferson v. Debra Jefferson, et al
as 21-35960
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RECARR JEFFERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA JEFFERSON, DANIEL JEFFERSON II and DANIEL JEFFERSON, Sr.
Jefferson v. Jefferson et al
as 3:2021cv01330
Plaintiff:
Recarr Jefferson
Defendant:
Debra Jefferson, Daniel Jefferson, II and Daniel Jefferson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Olivo (Clase)
as 21-874
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Clase
Jamie Danielle Jefferson v. California Highway Patrol
as 2:2020cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jamie Danielle Jefferson
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Olivo (Edwin Romero)
as 19-4053
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edwin Romero
United States of America v. Olivo (Anibal Gonzalez)
as 19-3684
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anibal Gonzalez
Jamie Danielle Jefferson v. California Highway Patrol
as 2:2019cv07761
Plaintiff:
Jamie Danielle Jefferson
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Olivo (Romero)
as 18-2026
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Olivo, AKA Pito, Rafael Romero, Francis Paluzzi and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Edwin Romero
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
