Cases 1 - 10 of 19
McKnight v. Nexstar Media Inc
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Daniel William McKnight
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Inc doing business as Nexstar Broadcasting Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McKnight v. Blaze Media LLC
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Daniel William McKnight
Defendant:
Blaze Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02812
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McKnight v. Backchina, LLC
as 4:2023cv03168
Plaintiff:
Daniel William McKnight
Defendant:
Backchina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Williams v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2022cv02388
Plaintiff:
Chauncil-Danielle Williams
Defendant:
Dallas County, Mesquite Office, Garland Office and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Williams v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2022cv02348
Plaintiff:
Chauncil-Danielle and Chauncil-Danielle Williams
Defendant:
State of Texas, Dallas County, Martin J Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Williams v. Harter et al
as 3:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
Chauncil-Danielle NLN and Chauncil-Danielle Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth S Harter, Medtemp LLC and Steven L Seider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Williams and Amanda Cortez Williams
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Santos v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Martha Castillo, Michael Welty, Michael King and others
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Guzman Santos, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
