Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al v. US Dep't of the Interior, et al
as 23-1853
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al v. US Dep't of the Interior, et al
as 23-1473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Interested Party:
VINEYARD WIND 1, LLC
Strahan v. McKiernan, et al
as 22-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, a/k/a Man Against Xtinction, a/k/a MAX
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES, JANET COIT, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv11091
Plaintiff:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, DEB HAALAND, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Vineyard Wind 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Strahan v. MEOEEA, et al
as 22-1225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN and RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS, Secretary, DAVID PIERCE, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF), DANIEL J. MCKIERNAN, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF) and others
Defendant:
ARTHUR SAWYER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as President of the Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association (MLA), CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES, JOHN HAVILAND and others
Interested Party:
MICHAEL J. MOORE, M.D., PETER CORKERON and UNITED STATES
Strahan v.McKiernan et al
as 1:2022cv10364
Defendant:
Whale Killing Bastard, Daniel McKieran, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Richard Strahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toxics Action Center, Inc. et al v. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv40089
Plaintiff:
Toxics Action Center, Inc. , Environment America, Inc. , Martha Bergstrom and others
Defendant:
Casella Waste Systems, Inc., Southbridge Recycling & Disposal Park, Inc. and The Town of Southbridge
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Town of Portsmouth v. Lewis, et al
as 15-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PORTSMOUTH, RI
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. LEWIS, in his official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DANIEL J. BERMAN, in his official capacity as Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Interested Party:
BRISTOL, RI and TIVERTON, RI
Town of Portsmouth, et al v. Lewis, et al
as 13-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PORTSMOUTH, RI
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. LEWIS, in his official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DANIEL J. BERMAN, in his official capacity as Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Interested Party:
TIVERTON, RI and BRISTOL, RI
Town of Portsmouth v. Lewis et al
as 1:2013cv00267
Plaintiff:
Town of Portsmouth
Defendant:
Michael P. Lewis , RI Department of Transportation , Daniel J. Berman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
