Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Daniel Naftalovich v. Unknown
as 2:2022cv08869
Plaintiff:
Daniel Naftalovich
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Renna et al v Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv02190
Plaintiff:
Laura Schwartz, Danielle Jaymes, Darin Prince and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Luis Lopez and Robert Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
In Re Nathaniel B. Sobayo
as 5:2020mc80145
Appellee:
Daniel Butt, Hong Jacqueline Gardner, Robert K Lane and others
Appellant:
Nathaniel Basolo Sobayo
Everett v. Justices of the California Supreme Court et al
as 3:2020cv03504
Defendant:
State Bar Court Judge Yvette Roland, State Bar of California and Justices of the California Supreme Court
Plaintiff:
Daniel Everett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lydia Olson et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2019cv10956
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, State of California and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Postmates Inc., Miguel Perez, Uber Technologies, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Raymond Frazier, Keisha Broussard, Engine Advocacy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Milano v. Douglas et al
as 3:2019cv03121
Defendant:
Danielle Douglas, Lisa Janine Mendez and State of California Inc
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Milano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In re: Office of Power of Attorney
as 5:2018mc80099
Defendant:
California State
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Judd
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
(PS) City of Sacramento v. Altstatt
as 2:2018cv00333
Plaintiff:
City of Sacramento
Defendant:
Daniel James Altstatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(PS) Altstatt et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2018cv00150
Defendant:
Superior Court of the State of California, Sacramento County, Robert C. Hight, Julia Mason and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Altstatt and Kim Eileen Glazzard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
