Cases 31 - 40 of 698
Haughey v. Dougherty et al
as 3:2023cv00958
Petitioner:
Norman Haughey
Respondent:
Daniel Dougherty and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenigsberg v. 51 Sky Top Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Dr. Daniel Kenigsberg and Daniel Kenigsberg
Defendant:
51 Sky Top Partners, LLC, Anthony E Monelli and Anthony E. Monelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nelson v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Mrs. Hannah Sullivan, Warden, Osborne CI, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guan v. Berger et al
as 3:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Wendy Berger, Joseph P. Farina, Latham, Luna, and Eden & Beaudibe law firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steinbock v. Town of Guilford
as 3:2023cv00843
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Steinbock
Defendant:
Town of Guilford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Donald Daniels
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Craig Washington, Michael Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltas v. Bowers et al
as 3:2023cv00764
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Shannon Bowers, Robert Martin, Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reale v. Wolfburg et al
as 3:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale
Defendant:
Daniel Wolfburg, Plainfield Police Department and Plainfield Police Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Carpenter v. Sitek
as 3:2023cv00719
Petitioner:
Daniel E. Carpenter
Respondent:
Jonathan Sitek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
