Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Conner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Daniel Dewayne Conner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City Of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Strong v. Dallas County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Elizabeth Daniels, Dallas County Commission, Dallas County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Conner v. McNeal et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Cooner and Daniel Dewayne Conner
Defendant:
Kendrick McNeal, Huey Hoss Mack, Dale Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fraisher, LLC
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Fraisher, LLC
Claimant:
Danielle Espinal and David Espinal
McNealey v. Shaw et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Elias Daniel McNealey
Defendant:
Calvin Shaw, Lt. Zigler and G Rooker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Montgomery v. Looney
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
Darlene Looney, Kevin Nelson, Daniel Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cunningham et al v. QBE Speciality Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
William M. Cunningham, Jr. and Kathryn N. Cunningham
Defendant:
QBE Speciality Insurance Company and Daniel T. Donohue, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
