Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Perkins v. Daniels et al
as 0:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Dr. Jack Daniels and Dr. Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torgerson v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02779
Petitioner:
Brady Daniel Torgerson
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01825
Petitioner:
Danielle Devona Jones
Respondent:
Warden Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mehaffy v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Ryan Daniel Mehaffy
Respondent:
Warden T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Meranelli v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric M. Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, State Operated Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perales v. Daniels et al
as 0:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Perales
Defendant:
Jack Daniels and Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Konz v. Witt
as 0:2023cv00679
Petitioner:
Deanna Sue Konz
Respondent:
Dawanna S. Witt, Michael K. Browne, Andrea Lyn Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benz-Whitebird v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Ms. Daniel Patrick Benz-Whitebird
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith, Dr. Mundo-Bruno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Beltz et al
as 0:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Daniel Crawford
Defendant:
T. Beltz and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. City of Andover et al
as 0:2022cv02361
Plaintiff:
Gideon C. Arrington, II
Defendant:
City of Andover, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
