Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Hafner v. McKee et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Daniel J. McKee, Peter F. Neronha and Gregg Amore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Martin et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
David Daoud Wright
Defendant:
Daniel Martin and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carr et al v. Barton Gilman LLP et al
as 1:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr and Core Healing Therapy
Defendant:
Barton Gilman LLP, All implicated therein, Rui Alves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Depina v. Cambell et al
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Laurinda Depina
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cambell, Brian Person, Anthony Troy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Cogley v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Michael Cogley
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Rhode Island Department of Public Safety, Sergeant Michael Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Amesbury v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury d/b/a Polytecnic
Defendant:
Hannah Burnes, David Goldstein, Donald Grebien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moreira v. Dolan
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Michael Moreira
Defendant:
Daniel Dolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
