Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ramos v. Malloy et al
as 3:2018cv01669
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Ramos
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, George Jepsen, Scott Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Malloy et al
as 3:2018cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Ramos
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy, Scott S. Semple, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Malloy et al
as 3:2018cv00583
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Ramos
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy, Town of Suffield, Scott S. Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Malloy
as 17-154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Dannel P. Malloy, Governor, in his official and individual capacity, Scott Semple, Commissioner, in his official and individual capacity, Monica Ellison, Deputy Commissioner, in her official and individual capacity and others
Cerilli v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv02085
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy, Scott Erfe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cerilli v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv02080
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy, Cay, Molden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cerilli v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv02087
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy, Scott Semple, G. Gerbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cerilli v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv02086
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy, Scott Semple, K. Maurer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cerilli v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv02088
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy, Scott Semple, Johnny Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv01614
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy, Scott Semple, Monica Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
