Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Vote Forward, et al v. Louis DeJoy, et al
as 20-5353
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Gary Young, Martha Thompson, Voces Unidas De Las Montanas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Louis DeJoy, in his official capacity as the Postmaster General and United States Postal Service
VOTE FORWARD et al v. DEJOY et al
as 1:2020cv02405
Plaintiff:
VOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS, PADRES & JOVENES UNIDOS, VOTE FORWARD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and LOUIS DEJOY
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dante Lizalde v. Martin Goldberg, et al
as 19-5149
Defendant / Appellee:
William Pelham Barr, U.S. Attorney General, Marcia G. Shein, Donald J. Trump, President of the U.S. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dante Lizalde
LIZALDE v. GOLDBERG et al
as 1:2019cv00956
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, MARCIA SHEIN, MARTIN G. GOLDBERG and others
Plaintiff:
DANTE LIZALDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEFFIELD v. USA
as 1:2016cv01235
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DANTE SHEFFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Dante Sheffield
as 12-3013
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Dante Sheffield
MORRIS v. FEDERAL ACQUISITION POLICY DIVISION
as 1:2011cv00549
Petitioner:
DANTE MORRIS
Respondent:
FEDERAL ACQUISITION POLICY DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WADE v. LUDOVIC et al
as 1:2010cv00376
Plaintiff:
DANTE WADE
Defendant:
ROCK LUDOVIC, UNKNOWN OFFICER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
