Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Cole v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Tavon Dante Cole
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RICE v. DOES et al
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
JOHN DOES and JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
BROOKS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00635
Petitioner:
DANTE MARQUEZ BROOKS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, JOHN DOE #2, K-9 OFFICER JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
English v. Ballard et al
as 5:2022ct03061
Plaintiff:
Quinton Dante English
Defendant:
Ricardo Ballard, Officer Johnson and John Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE and YEDIDIAH SHAKUR-EL
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, MAJOR MOORE, CAPTAIN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. GREENSBORO JAIL CENTRAL
as 1:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
GREENSBORO JAIL CENTRAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. USA
as 5:2021cv00025
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Quindarius Dante Rainey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
