Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Derek Thomas v. John Bartholomew, IV, et al
as 23-13683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, IV, DANIEL CHARLES DAVIS, HARLAND GRIFFITH and others
Larry Clark, Sr. v. LC Halsten LLC, et al
as 23-12499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY CLARK, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LC HALSTEN LLC, BH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, CASTLEGATE PROPERTY GROUP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thomas v. John Bevis et al
as 1:2023cv01034
Defendant:
Barnes Land & Investments, LLC, John Bartholomew IV, Daniel Charles Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Suleman v. Darden Restaurant Inc.
as 1:2023cv20024
Plaintiff:
Nissim Suleman
Defendant:
Darden Restaurant Inc. Stockholder for Yard House USA Inc. a Delaware corporation d/b/a Yard House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Clark et al v. LC Halsten LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03620
Plaintiff:
Larry Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
LC Halsten LLC doing business as The Halsten At Vinings Mountain, BH Management Services, LLC, Castlegate Property Group and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
