Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Rios (PS) v. Board of County Commissioners of Adams County, Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff: Starr Rios
Defendant: Board of County Commissioners of Adams County, Colorado, Gene Caps, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hill v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2021cv02565
Plaintiff: Darius Hill
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Hand et al
as 1:2021cv01608
Defendant: Tim Hand, Mike Ruttenberg and Dana Hersh
Plaintiff: Darius Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHAHARY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00002
Defendant: Federal Transfer Center, United States Bureau of Prisons, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Plaintiff: DARIUS A GHAHARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Mansfield, et al
as 20-1290
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARIUS CARLTON HILL
Defendant / Appellee: BEBE, Deputy, MRS. MANSFIELD, Unit Team, MRS. LEWIS, Counselor and others
Hill v. Mansfield et al
as 1:2020cv01762
Defendant: Bebe, Lewis, Mansfield and others
Plaintiff: Darius Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
United States v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1018
Defendant / Appellant: DARIUS CARLTON HILL
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Samson v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2019cv03118
Defendant: Richard Reigenborn, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Yvon (I) Benoit and others
Plaintiff: Michael Joseph Samson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Hill
as 19-1163
Defendant / Appellant: DARIUS CARLTON HILL
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?