Cases 11 - 20 of 34
McCollum v. City of New York
as 2:2016cv04483
Defendant:
City of New York
Plaintiff:
Darius McCollum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. USA
as 3:2016cv00987
Petitioner:
Darius Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mosley et al v. Mingo et al
as 1:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Osiris Mosley, Darius Henry, Born Poledore and others
Defendant:
Maxsolaine Mingo, Joseph Ponte and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burris v. Whitney Capital Management et al
as 2:2015cv01207
Plaintiff:
Darius Burris
Defendant:
Chen, Paul Delle, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lowery v. Edwards et al
as 6:2015cv06098
Plaintiff:
Darius Lowery
Defendant:
Edwards, John Doe, Gleeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burris v. Nassau County District Attorney et al
as 2:2014cv05540
Defendant:
Lieutenant Boden, Detective Dezelic, Detective J. Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Darius Burris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. USA
as 1:2014cv00037
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darius G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Strong v. Doe 1 et al
as 9:2012cv01818
Plaintiff:
Darius Strong
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasaun v. Wolf
as 12-3486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rasaun Bullock
Defendant:
Wardens, Chiefs, Captains and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard T. Wolf, Executive Director, Board of Corrections, Dora Shapiro, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, New York City and others
Rasaun v. Wolf
as 12-3486
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rasaun Bullock
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard T. Wolf, Executive Director, Board of Corrections, Dora Shapiro, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, New York City and others
Defendant:
Wardens, Chiefs, Captains and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
