Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moffett v. Jaeger
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Darius Darnell Moffett
Respondent:
Prairie du Chien Correctional Institution and Warden Peter J Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera Diaz et al v. Peterson et al
as 2:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reedy, Sylvester Thomas, Antonio Brooks and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Denita R Ball, Cpt William Dokert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Wells
as 2:2023cv00820
Petitioner:
Robert Darius Spencer
Respondent:
Johnson and Warden Jason Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Luther et al
as 2:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Darius D Banks, Sr
Defendant:
Eric Luther, Mental health staff and Melissa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Schmaling et al
as 2:2021cv00128
Defendant:
Brian Van Schyndel, Patricia Hanson, Christopher Schmaling and others
Plaintiff:
Darius D Banks, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weiman et al v. Braeger Finance LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01673
Plaintiff:
Darius Derrik Deyhimi, Denise Bryant and Carl Weiman
Defendant:
Braeger Finance LLC and The Blue Star Fund Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. USA
as 3:2020cv00812
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Darius Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dismuke v. McKenzie
as 2:2018cv01741
Respondent:
Avery McKenzie
Petitioner:
Darius Dismuke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Estate of James Franklin Perry v. Wenzel et al
as 2:2012cv00664
Plaintiff:
Estate of James Franklin Perry
Defendant:
Cheryl Wenzel , Deputy Kickbush , Nicole Virgo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennings v. Paquin
as 2:2011cv00390
Petitioner:
Darius Jennings
Respondent:
John Paquin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
