Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS and JERRY M. HOBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stubbs, III v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Yvette Kane, C. Darnell Jones, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. HOBECK et al
as 2:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
JERRY HOBECK, ESQUIRE JUDITH POTOKA PETRUSH and FRANK J PALLONE JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. JONES
as 2:2022cv02868
Plaintiff:
KEVINO GRAHAM
Defendant:
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DARNELL JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEDY v. LEESON et al
as 5:2018cv04414
Defendant:
D. BROOKS SMITH, JOSEPH F. LEESON, JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
PICOZZI v. MCKEOWN et al
as 2:2018cv02532
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PICOZZI
Defendant:
WILLIAM MCKEOWN, BRENDIN GREER, GARY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PICOZZI v. TOMAS et al
as 2:2018cv02324
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PICOZZI
Defendant:
STEVE TOMAS, C. DARNELL JONES, II, CYNTHIA M. RUFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALTHOUR v. JONES
as 2:2016cv01530
Plaintiff:
VICTOR WALTHOUR
Defendant:
C. DARNELL JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. JONES et al
as 2:2010cv02246
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS
Defendant:
C. DARNELL JONES, II, THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, D. WEBSTER KEOGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCAIN v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2009cv04153
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, C. DARNELL JONES, WEBSTER KEOGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
