Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 2:2022cv00261
Petitioner:
Broderick Darnell Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Code Enforcement Business et al
as 3:2022cv01907
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Code Enforcement Business, Stacey Graves, The MacFarlane Firm PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Gorman et al
as 3:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Esther Gorman, Gene Gorman, Code Enforcement Cedar Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Haynes
as 2:2011cv00294
Plaintiff:
Gregory Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Frankie Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Thaler et al
as 2:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
Gregory Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Rick Thaler and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Inmate Trust Fund Statement of Account
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Haynes
as 2:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Gregory Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Frankie Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Thaler et al
as 2:2011cv00290
Plaintiff:
Gregory Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Rick Thaler and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Inmate Trust Fund Statement of Account
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Thaler et al
as 2:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Gregory Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Rick Thaler and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Inmate Trust Fund Statement of Account
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
