Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Roudybush v. Duncan et al
as 6:2014cv01374
Plaintiff:
John Roudybush
Defendant:
Randy Duncan, John Calven Price, James Gile and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
In re: Knox
as 12-7060
Petitioner:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Barnett v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eugene Barnett
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Randall Workman, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Duran v. Wilson et al
as 6:2010cv00379
Plaintiff:
Kandace Duran
Defendant:
Darrell Wilson, Leroy Henry, Randy Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Payne, et al
as 10-7075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES H PAYNE, U.S. District Judge, FRANK H. SEAY, U.S. District Judge, RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden, OSP and others
Berryhill v. Payne et al
as 6:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
James H. Payne, Frank H. Seay, Randall Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Aldridge, et al
as 10-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ALDRIDGE, D & E Unit Manager, OSP, AMY THOMAS, D Unit Case Manager, OSP, BRIAN HOLDEN, D Unit Mental Health Officer, OSP and others
Knox v. Aldridge et al
as 6:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
Debra Aldridge, Amy Thomas, Brian Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Pink-Roberts, et al
as 09-7082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CRYSTA PINK-ROBERTS, DEBBIE ALDRIDGE, NEAMYRA RIDDLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
