Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Carmichael v. Newport News Police Dept.
as 4:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lynn Carmichael
Defendant:
Newport News Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Higgs v. White
as 2:2023cv00485
Petitioner:
Desmond Darryl Higgs
Respondent:
Rick White
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Pelter v. Bryant et al
as 7:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Pelter
Defendant:
Roger Bryant, MaKayla Jorgenson and Rockbridge Regional Jail Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Streeval et al
as 7:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Daryl Vincent Xzavier Washington and Darryl Washington
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Ledford, Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pelter v. Bryant et al
as 1:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Pelter
Defendant:
Roger Bryant, MaKayla Jorgenson and Rockbridge Regional Jail Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson-Bey v. Grant et al
as 2:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Daro Johnson-Bey
Defendant:
Steve Grant, CARMAX, Darryl Anton Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Anderson v. Spencer
as 4:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anderson
Defendant:
Trooper Darryl Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seay v. USA
as 4:2021cv00022
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darryl Marshall Seay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 7:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Captain Monica Perkins, Major David Bell and Sheriff Tim Allen
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ramon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
