Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pruitt v. Cook County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2020cv07237
Defendant:
Jewel-Osco, Tazewell County Jail, W.O.C.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Fraternal Order of Police et al
as 1:2020cv06751
Defendant:
Steven Darryl Pruitt, Turbeyville, City Of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2020cv05626
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
W.O.C.C., eBay, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pruitt v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv05136
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Dr. Bednarz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. People of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2018cv05103
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Judge King, People of the State of Illinois, Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv04963
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Officer McDonough, Chicago Police Dept. and Illinois Masonic Hospital Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Cook County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2017cv01417
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Cook County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Dr. Susnjar et al
as 1:2017cv01380
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Dr. Susnjar and Elgin Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2017cv01267
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Amtrak and Union Station Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv11544
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Cook County Department of Corrections, Dr. Bednars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
