Cases 31 - 40 of 5,846
Baxter v. Magic Darts, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv08287
Plaintiff:
Laura Baxter
Defendant:
Magic Darts, Inc., John A. Baxter, Jr. and Kelly Baxter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Baxter v. Magic Darts, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Laura Baxter
Defendant:
Magic Darts, Inc., John A. Baxter, Jr. and Kelly Baxter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Mayfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02216
Plaintiff:
Shunte Lamont Mayfield
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
Tirnell Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Illinois, Klimik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Robbie Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, Superintendent Boutte and Director Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
William G. Roberson, III
Defendant:
Cook County, State of Illinois, Chief Circuit Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Howard v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Jamayle Howard
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart and Concepcion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kyle Bernard Lewis
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
Derieon Thomas
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Velazquez, J. Frausto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Dart
as 1:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Jerome Simpson
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
