Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SELLERS v. THE BETHANY CIRCLE OF KING'S DAUGHTERS OF MADISON, INDIANA, INC. d/b/a NORTON - KING'S DAUGHTERS' HEALTH, INC.
as 4:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
ERLENA SELLERS
Defendant:
THE BETHANY CIRCLE OF KING'S DAUGHTERS OF MADISON, INDIANA, INC. d/b/a NORTON - KING'S DAUGHTERS' HEALTH, INC. and THE BETHANY CIRCLE OF KING'S DAUGHTERS' OF MADISON, INDIANA, INC. d/b/a NORTON - KING'S DAUGHTERS' HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BETHANY CIRCLE OF KING'S DAUGHTERS OF MADISON, INDIANA, INC.
as 4:2016cv00009
Defendant:
BETHANY CIRCLE OF KING'S DAUGHTERS OF MADISON, INDIANA, INC.
Relator:
JESSICA KIETZMAN
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
METZGER v. EDWARD NEUTZ SONS AND DAUGHTERS, INC., et al
as 4:2013cv00140
Defendant:
EDWARD NEUTZ SONS AND DAUGHTERS, INC. and EDWARD NEUTZ
Plaintiff:
SUSAN METZGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
INDIANA CHARITABLE TRUST FOR BENEFIT OF DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL et al v. TREVOR REES-JONES
as 1:2011cv01559
Plaintiff:
INDIANA CHARITABLE TRUST FOR BENEFIT OF DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, OUR LITTLE ROSES FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY, INC., JACOBS SCHOOL OF MUSIC INDIANA UNIVERSITY
Defendant:
TREVOR REES-JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DEASY et al v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv00556
Plaintiff:
WILLARD WAYNE DEASY and MINOR DAUGHTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
