Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sweatt v. Rausch
as 3:2026cv01061
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sweatt
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Medrano et al
as 3:2026cv00355
Plaintiff:
Randy Lane, Jr.
Defendant:
David Medrano and Heho Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Martin v. City of Brownsville, Tennessee et al
as 1:2026cv01162
Plaintiff:
Isiah Martin
Defendant:
City of Brownsville, Tennessee, Haywood County, Tennessee, David Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02911
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02898
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02899
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Shelby County Sheriff et al
as 3:2026cv01002
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff, Department Dupty Jailers and Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02891
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02887
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nicholson v. Hickman County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2026cv00078
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nicholson
Defendant:
Hickman County, Tennessee, Southern Health Partners, Inc., Sheriff Jason Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
