Cases 1 - 10 of 89
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 1:2023cv21019
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 2:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, OFFICER JOHN DOE, DESK SERGEANT JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05151
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRESTON OWENS, SR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OWENS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12590
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAY OWENS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOGAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. LOGAN, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR, DAVID S. OWENS and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. OWENS et al
as 1:2021cv20714
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANTHONY GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59914
Plaintiff:
DAVID R OWENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv13805
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROWN
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID S. OWEN, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens, Sr. v. LifeMD, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03384
Defendant:
Juan Manuel Pieiro Dagnery, LifeMD, Inc., Marc Benathen and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Owens, Sr.
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
