Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Lapp v. Cohen et al
as 1:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Katie F. Lapp
Defendant:
David Alan Cohen, Trudy Mintz, Brian Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gibson v. Kadmon Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01503
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gibson
Defendant:
Kadmon Holdings, Inc., Harlan W. Waksal, Tasos G. Konidaris and others
WHITFIELD v. KADMON HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04605
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
KADMON HOLDINGS, INC., TASOS G KONIDARIS, HARLAN W WAKSAL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Wilhelm v. Kadmon Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01470
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Kadmon Holdings, Inc., Harlan W. Waksal, Tasos G. Konidaris and others
In re Lordstown Motors Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv00604
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Cohen, David M. Cohen, Herbert Stotler and others
Defendant:
Keith A. Feldman, Martin J. Rucidlo, David T. Hamamoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Dermira, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00132
Defendant:
Thomas G. Wiggans, Bald Eagle Acquisition Corporation, Matthew Fust and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
