Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 90
RICHARDSON v. MCFADDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00253
Petitioner: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent: D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHARDSON v. DIBATTISTA et al
as 2:2017cv00187
Plaintiff: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant: JOHN DIBATTISTA, WEST CHESTER POLICE NARCOTICS UNIT, WEST CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2016cv05535
Plaintiff: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant: MORGAN TAYLOR and BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. MCFADDEN
as 2:2016cv05536
Petitioner: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent: DAVID E. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHARDSON v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05490
Plaintiff: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant: PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and KAREN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. GESSNER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05461
Plaintiff: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant: GESSNER and PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05220
Plaintiff: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant: PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and GESSNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv03019
Plaintiff: David James Richardson, Jr
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RICHARDSON v. HAMM et al
as 2:2016cv02684
Plaintiff: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant: HAMM, SERGI, TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. MCFADDEN
as 2:2016cv02228
Plaintiff: DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Defendant: EDWARD D. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?