Cases filed in Pennsylvania
YOUNG v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03454
Plaintiff: DAVID JARED YOUNG
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mitchell v. Lappin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant: Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff: Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NULL v. MCCALMONT TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv01314
Defendant: ORRIE DUANE MANNERS, BUREAU VERITAS, DAVID L. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff: CLIFFORD NULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05871
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CHASE v. GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY et al
as 3:2012cv00180
Petitioner: WARREN CHASE
Respondent: GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, LT. GOV. ANTHONY G. BROWN, SECRETARY STATE, JOSHUA SHATSTERN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45033
Plaintiff: DAVID S. YOUNG
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
YOUNG v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76727
Plaintiff: DAVID LEROY YOUNG
Defendant: 3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
YOUNG v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00091
Petitioner: DAVID JAMES YOUNG
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60402
Plaintiff: DAVID K. YOUNG, DAVID K. YOUNG, DAVID K. YOUNG and others
Defendant: E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?