Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 109
The Burlington Insurance Company v. S. Huh, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv02239
Plaintiff: The Burlington Insurance Company
Defendant: S. Huh, Inc and David Bobby Lynn, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Bedford v. Kasich et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00351
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Bedford
Defendant: John R Kasich , Gary Mohr , David Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. Bobby We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00060
Petitioner: Quisi Bryan
Respondent: David Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Wesley Thompson v. David Bobby
as 10-4561
Petitioner - Appellant: WESLEY THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID BOBBY, Warden
Michael Buehner v. David Bobby We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-4369
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL BUEHNER
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID BOBBY, Warden
Broom v. Bobby We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02058
Petitioner: Romell Broom
Respondent: David Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Parker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00495
Plaintiff: David E. Clark
Defendant: J. Parker, Sgt. Kleinknecht, Mr. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Bobby
as 4:2010cv00353
Petitioner: Gregory Curry
Respondent: David Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Mark Brown
as 10-3107
Movant: In re: MARK BROWN
Respondent: TED STRICKLAND and DAVID BOBBY
Trimble v. Bobby We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00149
Petitioner: James Trimble
Respondent: David Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?