Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THEODORE v. PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. THEODORE
Defendant:
PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MICHAEL OTWORTH, MICHAEL E. DEE and others
Respondent:
HINDENBURG RESEARCH, LLC
Ayers v. PureCycle Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Defendant:
Michael Otworth, Richard Brenner, Tanya Burnell and others
Nominal Defendant:
PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Han v. Otworth et al
as 1:2021cv01569
Plaintiff:
Han Byung-Gook and Byung-Gook Han
Defendant:
Michael Otworth, Richard Brenner, Tanya Burnell and others
Nominal Defendant:
PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
Tennenbaum v. PureCycle Technologies, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00818
Plaintiff:
David Tennenbaum
Defendant:
Michael Otworth, Byron Roth, PureCycle Technologies, Inc. and others
Gioia Capital, LLC v. Paragon Marketing Group, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01824
Plaintiff:
Gioia Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Julie Simmons, Rashid Ghazi, Tony Schiller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glasscock v. Mt. Orab Village of et al
as 1:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
John R. Glasscock
Defendant:
Mt. Orab Village of, George Baker, Ryan Gergory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scheck Investments, et al v. Viatical Benefactors, et al
as 1:2004cv21160
Plaintiff:
Scheck Investments, L.P. , Paul Pappas and Elena Parrales
Defendant:
Viatical Benefactors, LLC, Viatical Services, Inc., Kensington Management, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Roberto Martinez
Movant:
Hugo Group , Calabria Assets Ltd and Post-Closing MBC Investors
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
