Cases 1 - 10 of 21
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00605
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, U.S. PROBATION OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN et al v. OUTLAW et al
as 2:2020cv01516
Defendant:
CAPTAIN CHARLES, SAUNITA GOODMAN, JACOBSEN and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY HARRELL, DENNIS WILLIAMS, DAVID BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WARDEN OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2019cv21965
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE and WARDEN OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2019cv05762
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY, JUDGE WENDY PEW and JOHN R. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. HILT et al
as 1:2018cv09791
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
HILT, FRANKS, LOOMIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01126
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JIM KENNY, MIRANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todie v. Garrison et al
as 3:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Todie
Defendant:
Richard Garrison, J. Lyons, MaryAnn McKimpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Brown v. John Williams, et al
as 15-3419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WILLIAMS, Parole Agent at SCI-Albion, MICHAEL CARRINGTON, Parole Supervisor at SCI-Albion, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, PBPP, Secretary and others
BROWN v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv04571
Respondent:
NANCY A. GIROUX, JOHN E. WETZEL, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv04570
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Respondent:
NANCY A. GIROUX, JOHN E. WETZEL, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
