Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Conner v. Valente
as 1:2026cv11338
Plaintiff:
Robert David Conner
Defendant:
Sergenat Anthony Valente
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conner v. City Of Evanston
as 1:2026cv10691
Plaintiff:
Robert David Conner
Defendant:
City Of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conner v. Cook County Criminal Court
as 1:2026cv10689
Plaintiff:
Robert David Conner
Defendant:
Cook County Criminal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONNER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2026cv00279
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID CONNER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MELISSA RUTLEDGE, DAVID CYBORSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Williams et al
as 2:2025cv00186
Plaintiff:
Robert David Conner
Defendant:
Williams, Molase and Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00946
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Robert David Conner and Robert D Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Smiley et al
as 3:2024cv00948
Defendant:
Cooper, Tracy Cornett, Jason Smiley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert D Conner and Robert David Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00947
Petitioner:
Robert Conner and Robert David Conner
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00705
Petitioner:
Robert David Conner and Robert D Conner
Respondent:
Warden
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00706
Petitioner:
Robert David Conner and Robert D Conner
Respondent:
Warden
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
