Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Chapman (PS) v. Aurora Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
James Chapman
Defendant:
Aurora Police Department, David Conner, David Galiagos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conner v. Mushrush Utility Contracting, Inc.
as 5:2022cv01759
Plaintiff:
David Conner
Defendant:
Mushrush Utility Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Conner v. Martinez et al
as 2:2021cv00363
Plaintiff:
Robert David Conner
Defendant:
Oscar Martinez, Sebens, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69334
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16092
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN DAVID CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2019cv03181
Respondent:
Warden Sean Pruitt, Executive Director Dean Williams, Attorney General Phil Weiser and others
Petitioner:
Justin David Conner and Justin Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allende et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11423
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Bracero, Thomas van de Kieft, Glenda Wajer and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Andrew Conner v. Leroy Kirkegard, et al
as 18-35257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
LEROY KIRKEGARD, ROBERT SHAW, TONY BARCLAY and others
Conner, David v. Reilly, Brent et al
as 3:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
David Conner
Defendant:
Brent Reilly , Rock County, Wisconsin and Rock County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
